Java Weekly, Issue 202 – Java周刊》第202期

最后修改: 2017年 11月 9日

中文/混合/英文(键盘快捷键:t)

Here we go…

我们来了……

1. Spring and Java

1.Spring和Java

>> New Version Scheme for Java SE Platform and the JDK [infoq.com]

The details of the next version scheme for Java.

Java的下一个版本计划的细节。

>> How to Implement Conditional Auditing with Hibernate Envers [thoughts-on-java.org]

A dive into Hibernate Envers and conditional auditing.

深入了解Hibernate Envers和条件审计。

>> SOLID Principles in Action: From Slack to Twilio [twilio.com]

An interesting, long read from Twilio engineering.

Twilio工程部的一篇有趣的长篇文章。

>> JEPs Proposed to Target JDK 10 [openjdk.java.net]

These are the early JEPs targeted for JDK 10.

这些是早期的JEP,以JDK 10为目标

Also worth reading:

Time to upgrade:

升级的时间:

2. Technical

2.技术

>> Microservices with Nomad and Consul [blog.codecentric.de]

The Nomad/Consul stack is another interesting option for Microservices.

Nomad/Consul栈是微服务的另一个有趣的选择。

>> The multiple usages of git rebase –onto [blog.frankel.ch]

git rebase certainly has many useful applications.

git rebase当然有很多有用的应用。

>> The Pain of Implicit Dependencies [blog.thecodewhisperer.com]

Introducing implicit dependencies can effectively make code legacy.

引入隐性的依赖关系可以有效地使代码遗留。

Also worth reading:

还值得一读的是:

3. Musings

3.思索

>> Becoming an accidental architect [oreilly.com]

The role of the architect might be more demanding than you think it is.

建筑师的角色可能比你想象的更苛刻。

>> How to Politely Say No and When To Do It [daedtech.com]

If there’s ever a silver bullet, it’s saying “no”.

如果有银弹的话,那就是说 “不”

It’s an uncomfortable skill most never master, and it can unlock a lot of great things, so it’s worth exploring and learning how to do right.

这是一个大多数人从未掌握的不舒服的技能,它可以解锁很多伟大的东西,所以值得探索并学习如何正确地做。

Also worth reading:

还值得一读的是:

4. Comics

4.漫画

And my favorite Dilberts of the week:

还有本周我最喜欢的Dilberts。

>> Barry Dingle [dilbert.com]

>> Barry Dingle Asks About Blockchain [dilbert.com]

>> App For Jumping Off the Roof [dilbert.com]

5. Pick of the Week

5 本周精选

>> You can have two Big Things, but not three [blog.asmartbear.com]